SB
Sterling Bancorp, Inc. (SBT)·Q1 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2024 was essentially breakeven with net loss of $(0.2)M or $(0.00) diluted EPS as higher deposit costs and elevated professional fees offset stable net interest income; NIM held flat at 2.52% while efficiency ratio rose to 101.7% from 83.8% in Q4 .
- Legal overhang eased: OCC concluded its investigation with consent orders against former executives and controlling shareholder; management expects the bulk of advanced legal fee reimbursements to be behind them, implying a tailwind to expenses from Q2 onward .
- Balance sheet remains conservative with leverage ratio 14.10% at HoldCo (13.58% at bank), ACL/loans of 2.24%, and low NPAs (0.39% of assets); loans declined 3% QoQ to $1.30B as the bank continues to prioritize liquidity and credit quality .
- Near-term margin pressure risk: a $50M FHLB advance at just under 2% matures mid‑May and will be repaid; ~$200M of loans reprice quarterly “up a couple hundred bps,” but management expects rising deposit costs to more than offset asset repricing, keeping NIM under pressure near term .
- Potential stock catalysts: confirmation that legal costs abate post‑OCC actions, progress on strategic alternatives/business model transition, and deposit mix improvements; conversely, stickier deposit betas or a slower rate-cut path could pressure earnings .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Regulatory resolution progress: “OCC completed its investigation” with consent orders against former parties; management believes “we’re done” with most reimbursable third‑party legal expenses, reducing a key non‑core cost drag going forward .
- Asset quality solid: nonperforming loans $9.3M (0.71% of loans) with management stating these are “100% residential,” roughly half current and paying, and “probably no loss content”; NCOs were 0.00% in Q1 .
- Capital and liquidity strong: leverage ratio 14.10% (HoldCo), cash and due from banks up 12% QoQ to $646.2M, and securities remain short duration/liquid .
-
What Went Wrong
- Profitability soft: essentially breakeven EPS $(0.00) and an efficiency ratio >100% as professional fees rose due to the absence of prior quarter insurance reimbursement and remaining third‑party legal cost reimbursements .
- Margin headwinds persist: deposit costs rose 21 bps QoQ, keeping NIM flat at 2.52% despite higher asset yields; management anticipates deposit pricing to “overwrite” asset repricing in the near term .
- Deposit mix: non‑interest‑bearing deposits fell 7% QoQ to $32.7M; customers migrated balances from MM/Savings into time deposits (tenors up to ~13 months) to lock rates, raising funding cost sensitivity .
Financial Results
Notes: No S&P Global consensus estimates were available via our connection for Q1 2024, so estimate comparisons are not shown.
Segment/Balance Mix (Loans)
Deposits
Asset Quality & Capital
Guidance Changes
Note: The press release and call did not provide quantitative guidance; management reiterated caution on margin trajectory and indicated legal/professional fees should normalize as OCC matters concluded .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “For all intents and purposes, it was a breakeven quarter… driven in large part by… legal expenses towards the tail end of these OCC investigations.”
- “Last week, the OCC completed its investigation… consent orders were issued to a former CEO and to our controlling shareholder.”
- “Margins remain under some pressure… we have a $50 million… FHLB advance… at just under 2%… [maturing] middle of May… [there] may be some additional pressures on margins.”
- “We have about $200 million of loans that reprice every quarter… up a couple of hundred basis points… but… [it] will be overwritten by the increasing deposit costs.” — CFO Karen Knott
- Reserves: “If you’re not at 1%, you’re kidding yourself… I’d say… 1.5% is probably the right level for the vast bulk of the industry. We do keep ours higher… there’s probably room [to move lower]… over the next few quarters.”
Q&A Highlights
- Expenses/Legal: Management believes elevated professional fees tied to OCC matters have largely ended; any future DOJ‑related witness/interview costs for certain individuals should be immaterial .
- Asset/liability repricing: ~$200M of loans reprice quarterly, but higher deposit costs and competition likely offset asset yield uplift; FHLB advance will be repaid, not rolled .
- Buybacks: Acknowledged buyback appeal with shares sub‑$5, but cited strategic constraints preventing action at this time .
- Nonaccruals: ~$9M NAs are all residential; about half are current payers; management expects minimal loss content and resolution over coming quarters; CA foreclosure process moves relatively quickly .
Estimates Context
- We attempted to pull S&P Global consensus for Q1 2024 EPS and revenue; consensus data for SBT was unavailable via our integration during this review. Therefore, no estimate comparisons or beat/miss determinations are shown.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Expense tailwind likely from Q2: with OCC matters concluded and insurance reimbursements behind them, professional fees should normalize, aiding the efficiency ratio from Q2 onward barring DOJ‑related immaterial items .
- Margin watch: repayment of a sub‑2% $50M FHLB advance and continued deposit repricing could weigh on NIM until rate relief or deposit betas slow; monitor cost of interest‑bearing liabilities (3.66% in Q1, +19 bps YoY, +19 bps QoQ) .
- Credit/capital provide downside protection: ACL/loans 2.24%, NPAs 0.39%, leverage ~14% underpin stability; potential reserve releases later in 2024 if benign credit persists could support earnings prints .
- Strategic optionality intact but timing uncertain: management remains cautious on deploying capital into new lending verticals given returns/compliance costs; strategic combinations remain a possibility if market conditions improve .
- Trading setup: Reduced legal uncertainty and expense normalization are positives; near‑term prints likely hinge on funding costs and deposit mix (continued migration to CDs vs growth in non‑interest bearing balances) .
- Balance sheet shrinkage likely continues near term as the bank prioritizes liquidity/credit quality over growth; expect modest declines in residential balances and stability/improvement in CRE credit metrics .
Citations
- Q1 2024 press release/8‑K and financial tables:
- Q1 2024 earnings call transcript (management quotes/Q&A):
- Prior quarter press releases for trend: Q4 2023 ; Q3 2023